|
PromoCell
proliferation medium ![]() Proliferation Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation medium/product/PromoCell Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
98/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Beijing Solarbio Science
proliferation medium ![]() Proliferation Medium, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation medium/product/Beijing Solarbio Science Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Fisher Scientific
proliferation medium ![]() Proliferation Medium, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation medium/product/Fisher Scientific Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Elabscience Biotechnology
proliferation medium ![]() Proliferation Medium, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation medium/product/Elabscience Biotechnology Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
PromoCell
proliferation media ![]() Proliferation Media, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation media/product/PromoCell Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation media - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
PromoCell
dedicated proliferation medium ![]() Dedicated Proliferation Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/dedicated proliferation medium/product/PromoCell Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dedicated proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Beijing Solarbio Science
nsc proliferation medium ![]() Nsc Proliferation Medium, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/nsc proliferation medium/product/Beijing Solarbio Science Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nsc proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Thermo Fisher
proliferation medium ![]() Proliferation Medium, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/proliferation medium/product/Thermo Fisher Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Increased utrophin expression in healthy and DMD patient derived myoblasts in response to ERK1/2 and EZH2 inhibitor treatment
doi: 10.64898/2026.04.13.718206
Figure Lengend Snippet: Corresponding to . a . Basal levels of MYOD1 mRNA in primary healthy human myoblasts (n=6) and primary DMD patient-derived myoblasts (n=16). Lines show median and quartiles. b . AB1098 cells were treated with 10 μM LY32 +/- 10 μM GSK503 or vehicle (DMSO) for 24 hours. Directly following treatment (0 days since drug removal) cells were manually counted, with trypan blue staining to discount dead cells. Cells were then replated at a constant concentration, cultured in proliferation media without drugs for 24 hours and counted again (1 day since drug removal). Cells were then replated at a constant concentration and cultured again for 6 days before counting (7 days since drug removal). Cells were passaged once in this 6-day period. Cell count is shown relative to the vehicle only control for each time point. c . RT-qPCR of MYOD1 in immortalised myoblasts AB1190 and AB1098 following treatment with varying concentrations of Ruxolitinib (Ruxo). Results are shown relative to vehicle treated sample with a two-way ANOVA with Dunnetts multiple comparison test to determine significance. Graph shows mean (n=3) +/- SEM. a-b . MYOD1 is normalised against TBP . *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Article Snippet: The muscle biopsy was enzymatically digested in basal medium (C-23060; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) containing collagenase D (2 mg/mL, Roche, Germany) and Dispase II (2 mg/mL, Sigma) for 1 h at 37°C with trituration every 15 min. After filtering through a 100-μm filter (BD Falcon) and centrifugation cells were resuspended in
Techniques: Derivative Assay, Staining, Concentration Assay, Cell Culture, Cell Characterization, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison
Journal: Journal of Materials Chemistry. B
Article Title: Systematic investigation of the effects of neural stem cell spheroid size and density on fate specification in 3D culture
doi: 10.1039/d5tb01589h
Figure Lengend Snippet: On day 5 of culture in differentiation medium, the hydrogels were fixed, sectioned at 10 µm and stained for (a) Ki-67 and (b) Ki-67 with Hoescht to confirm the presence of proliferative cells. Scale bars are 100 µm. (c) These images were analyzed using cell profiler to determine the percentage of nuclear expression (* p < 0.05, N = 11, error bars represent ± SEM). A test of normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and subsequently ordinary two-way ANOVA (Tukey's multiple comparison test) was performed using GraphPad Prism to determine significance difference between the groups. The small sphere, low density group had a higher proportion of nuclear Ki-67 expression than the small sphere, high density group. (d) Flow cytometry was performed to compare proliferation, represented by the percentage of EdU positive cells. A test of normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and subsequently ordinary two-way ANOVA (Tukey's multiple comparison test) was performed using GraphPad Prism to determine significance between the groups. ( N = 3–4, error bars represent ± SEM). No significant differences were observed.
Article Snippet: They were then cultured in these plates with
Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Comparison, Flow Cytometry
Journal: Materials Today Bio
Article Title: Neuroactive network tissue based on dual-factor neuroregenerative bioactive coating scaffolds and neural stem cells for spinal cord injury repair
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102172
Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation and bioactivity evaluation of immobilized recombinant growth factors and the construction of the neuroregenerative coating fiber network scaffold. (A) SDS-PAGE gel showed the preparation process of immobilized recombinant growth factors D-IGF1 and D-NGF including: marker (M), pre-induction (1), post-induction (2), supernatant after centrifugation (3), pellet after centrifugation (4), refolded protein solution (5), flow-through liquid (6), wash liquid (7), elution liquid (8). (B) The effect of different densities of D-IGF1 and D-NGF on NSC proliferation. (C–D) The effect of different densities of D-IGF1 and D-NGF on neural stem cell differentiation. Scale bars, 100 μm (E) SEM images of the surface morphology of fiber scaffolds prepared under different process parameters. Scale bars, 10 μm (F–G) Biocompatibility testing of the scaffold. (H) Contact angle analysis. (I) FT-IR analysis. (J) XPS analysis. (Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 3, ∗p < 0.05,∗∗p < 0.01).
Article Snippet: The resulting cells were resuspended in
Techniques: Recombinant, SDS Page, Marker, Centrifugation, Cell Differentiation